Quadro RTX 4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 for Blender
Compare Quadro RTX 4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 for Blender: benchmarks, VRAM, render-time estimates, power, and upgrade fit. Quadro RTX 4000 leads the Blender benchmark score by 3.2%.
Fastest in Blender
Quadro RTX 4000 (2,168.17 score)
Most VRAM
Quadro RTX 5000 (16 GB)
Lowest power draw
Quadro RTX 4000 (160 W TDP)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 2,168.17 | 2,100.69 -3% |
| CUDA cores | 2,304 -25% | 3,072 |
| Boost clock | 1545 MHz -15% | 1815 MHz |
| RT cores | RT cores: 36 -25% | RT cores: 48 |
| Tensor cores | Tensor cores: 288 -25% | Tensor cores: 384 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 8 GB -50% | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416 GB/s -7% | 448 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 160 W | 230 W +44% |
| Release year | 2018 | 2018 |
Benchmark comparison
Estimated seconds to render one frame of each standard Blender benchmark scene. Lower is faster.
These timings are derived from Blender Open Data benchmark medians and should be treated as comparative estimates, not guaranteed real-project render times.
Which GPU makes more sense?
Quadro RTX 4000 is faster for Blender rendering, but Quadro RTX 5000 has more VRAM. That makes this a speed-versus-scene-headroom decision.
Blender render speed
Quadro RTX 4000 leads by 3.2% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (2,168 vs 2,101). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene headroom
Quadro RTX 5000 has more scene headroom with 16 GB of VRAM versus 8 GB on Quadro RTX 4000. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power and cooling
Quadro RTX 4000 is the lower-power option at 160 W TDP, compared with 230 W for Quadro RTX 5000. If render speed is close, that can make Quadro RTX 4000 easier to cool and run quietly.
Upgrade decision
Quadro RTX 4000 is the straightforward performance pick, while Quadro RTX 5000 needs a price, power, availability, or compatibility advantage to make more sense.
Quick take on Quadro RTX 4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 4000 leads the Blender benchmark score by 3.2%.
Fastest in Blender: Quadro RTX 4000 2,168.17 score.
Most VRAM: Quadro RTX 5000 16 GB.
Lowest power draw: Quadro RTX 4000 160 W TDP.
Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.