Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation for Blender
Compare Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation for Blender: benchmarks, VRAM, render-time estimates, power, and upgrade fit. Quadro RTX 8000 leads the Blender benchmark score by 8.0%.
Fastest in Blender
Quadro RTX 8000 (2,887.81 score)
Most VRAM
Quadro RTX 8000 (48 GB)
Lowest power draw
RTX 2000 Ada Generation (70 W TDP)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Blender benchmark score | 2,887.81 | 2,674.75 -7% |
| CUDA cores | 4,608 | 2,816 -39% |
| Boost clock | 1770 MHz -17% | 2130 MHz |
| RT cores | RT cores: 72 | RT cores: 22 -69% |
| Tensor cores | Tensor cores: 576 | Tensor cores: 88 -85% |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 48 GB | 16 GB -67% |
| Memory bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 256 GB/s -62% |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory bus | 384-bit | 128-bit -67% |
| Platform | ||
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Render support | OptiX, CUDA | OptiX, CUDA |
| TDP | 260 W +271% | 70 W |
| Release year | 2018 | 2024 |
Benchmark comparison
Estimated seconds to render one frame of each standard Blender benchmark scene. Lower is faster.
These timings are derived from Blender Open Data benchmark medians and should be treated as comparative estimates, not guaranteed real-project render times.
Which GPU makes more sense?
Quadro RTX 8000 is the stronger Blender rendering pick here based on benchmark score.
Blender render speed
Quadro RTX 8000 leads by 8.0% in the Renderjuice Blender benchmark model (2,888 vs 2,675). For render-time-first decisions, that is the card to prioritize.
VRAM and scene headroom
Quadro RTX 8000 has more scene headroom with 48 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB on RTX 2000 Ada Generation. That matters most for large environments, dense geometry, high-resolution textures, and less optimized production files.
Power and cooling
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the lower-power option at 70 W TDP, compared with 260 W for Quadro RTX 8000. If render speed is close, that can make RTX 2000 Ada Generation easier to cool and run quietly.
Upgrade decision
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is newer, but Quadro RTX 8000 still leads this Blender benchmark comparison. That makes the older card worth considering when used pricing or VRAM capacity is favorable.
Quick take on Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Quadro RTX 8000 leads the Blender benchmark score by 8.0%.
Fastest in Blender: Quadro RTX 8000 2,887.81 score.
Most VRAM: Quadro RTX 8000 48 GB.
Lowest power draw: RTX 2000 Ada Generation 70 W TDP.
Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 16 GB, which matters when scenes, textures, or geometry get heavier.
If you are deciding between these cards for Blender, focus first on Blender benchmark score, VRAM capacity, memory bandwidth, and whether your scenes are likely to benefit more from raw speed or extra memory headroom. The comparison table above keeps those tradeoffs in one place.